| Review of Spartan Society,
edited by Thomas J. Figueira
Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 07.02.2005
Review by Ibrahim Amin
The sixteen essays contained within this volume were initially
papers presented at the International Sparta Seminar. As one
might expect from a series of works tested at, and in some cases
honed by, such an event, they offer a first class discussion
of a wide variety of issues pertaining to Spartan culture.
Obviously this kind of book, which collects essays bound together
by an event rather than a theme (other than the rather broad
theme of Sparta, of course), is not designed to be read from
cover to cover by the average reader. Instead its various contents
will be of value to different people looking for information
on different subjects. Thus it is perhaps worth approaching
it from that angle, rather than trying to judge the book as
if it were a homogenous entity.
Some of the essays would certainly be of interest to a variety
of scholars or even general readers, for example Morris' discussion
on how Spartan democracy was seen during the Enlightenment.
The author takes the reader through the different camps of thought,
using generous quotations to reveal how pro-Spartan and anti-Spartan
sources retrospectively viewed the ancient state and evaluated
its culture and form of government, especially in contrast with
Athens. This insight into the roots of modern democratic thought,
and the perhaps slightly surprising supremacy of Sparta over
Athens in the progression towards the modern form, was a most
welcome encounter. A devotee of either ancient history or political
thought in general would find something to ponder here.
Clough's Loyalty and liberty: Thermopylae in western imagination
would likewise be of broad appeal. Whilst some historians might
be somewhat sick of hearing about the battle, given the perhaps
excessive (albeit understandable) emphasis it is given by laymen,
this essay provides a rather refreshing change by illuminating
how the battle was depicted in later art -- ranging from the
18th Century epic Leonidas to the 20th Century movie 300 Spartans.
Many works talk ad nauseum about how impressive and noble the
Spartan stand at Thermopylae was, but few allow the reader to
really appreciate just how influential it has been over the
last few centuries and how artists during this period used the
image of the battle to reflect issues in their own times. Given
the current popularity of Thermopylae due to novels like Gates
of Fire, this essay's ability to draw attention to older works
(not to mention their historical contexts) whose existence might
be unknown to many readers is quite laudable.
Whilst the other essays in the collection might not have quite
so broad an appeal as the aforementioned pair, many of them
certainly help elucidate larger issues in the Greek world, making
them valuable reading even to those whose sphere of interest
does not prominently include Sparta. Christesen's Utopia on
the Eurotas: Economic aspects of the Spartan mirage is a prime
example of this. The author examines what ideals the Greeks
held when it came to the economic structure of the polis. Using
sources such as Plato and Homer, he creates a scale to evaluate
how close to the ultimate utopian ideal different systems used
by Greek settlements came. This is then used to examine Sparta
and the extent to which her economic system qualified or was
at least thought to qualify from the point of view of outside
observers. There is a clear value in examining a culture's idea
of what a utopia might be, since this to some degree could be
said to permeate all aspects of their philosophy. Hence Christesen's
essay could be of use to most readers.
Though perhaps this betrays a personal bias towards issues
of military history, I find it tempting to see Anton Powell's
essay on the role of Greek women in combat situations as being
the jewel in this collection. The image of the Spartan woman
engaging in athletic training is something that popular documentaries
and people with a casual interest in ancient history tend to
make a great deal out of. And this is understandable, since
it seems to indicate that Spartan women would be especially
martial, ready for combat should the situation ever arise --
unlike the women of other poleis, who would spent their days
indoors shunning such manly pursuits. However, Powell draws
attention to the curious fact that when Sparta was attacked
her women simply flew into a blind panic. Far from doing anything
constructive, they ran around shrieking and disrupted the defence
of their polis. Beginning with Aristotle's commentary on the
event, Powell illustrates that, unexpected though this may be,
other Greek women tended to conduct themselves in a much better
fashion during combat situations, actually aiding their side
by hurling missiles from rooftops or raising their voices in
an inspiring ululation. This is surely an issue of importance
to any student of ancient military history. But naturally the
role of women in combat would not have been a major factor in
ancient warfare (with the exception of urban warfare), it is
still something which deserves examination. Powell convincingly
argues that this disparity between Spartan women and other Greek
women was due to certain aspects of Spartan culture, which made
an attack on their polis seem especially traumatic.
In tandem with Powell's essay, Hodkinson's paper on female
property rights in Sparta tackles the wider issue of the comparative
roles of women in the Greek world. Here the author examines
the extent to which Spartan women had true control over their
property, what exactly this entailed, and how this affected
their position within Spartan society. By comparisons with other
law codes, most notably that of Gortyn, the author illustrates
that Spartan women had greater rights to their property than
their counterparts in other poleis. However, he goes on to show
that this wealth was in a sense limited by the restrictions
on the expenditure of wealth which were hallmarks of Spartan
society. Nevertheless, archaeological evidence is used to indicate
the use of female wealth for temple offerings, and Hodkinson
cites instances of women funding successful chariot teams at
athletics festivals to demonstrate that this control of property
did allow them to achieve certain things. Furthermore, he draws
attention to the fact that, as many Spartiates underwent economic
hardship during the later periods, this gave wealthy women the
opportunity to gain impressive networks of influence via their
purses. The essay provides an interesting look at the dynamics
of Spartan society, and the varying opportunities presented
to women of different poleis, or different economic classes
within a polis.
Most of the essays in the volume by contrast are rather more
localised in their subject matter. The opening essay, for example
-- Link's paper on the very uniquely Spartan attitudes towards
theft. He examines the Spartan use of thievery, making convincing
parallels with the Homeric model of heroism, and expands this
to include the annual 'wars' with the helot population of Laconia
-- illustrating that the same fundamental mentality lay behind
both a young Spartan boy stealing food and Spartan warriors
extracting tribute from the helots. Whilst this subject matter
is of course of primary appeal to students of Sparta rather
than the Greek world in general (unless they happened to be
researching thievery in the Hellenic world), the light nature
of the essay and the perhaps natural fascination human beings
have with crime makes this rather readable and entertaining,
and a strong opening to the book. The same could be said of
the subsequent chapter, David's look into Spartan suicide. Though
once again we are looking at something narrower than that presented
in some of the other chapters, the material is very easily digestible.
Even a casual reader would probably be intrigued by the subject
matter. The author uses all the relevant source material to
look at and characterise each form of suicide, discussing the
purpose behind them, the specific method by which death was
inflicted, and the attitudes each one evoked in Spartan society.
Other chapters are a little heavier in their specialisation,
such as Richer's paper on the Hyakinthia festival, Brulé
and Piolot's on the hierai, Tuplin's on Xenophon's temple to
Ephesian Artemis at Scillus, and Figueira's on the kleros. These
are all excellently researched and argued, and are highly detailed
examinations into the respective issues. Thus they would certainly
be valuable to scholars investigating those topics. Some of
these also contain material of wider relevance. Brulé
and Piolot, for example, dispel the common misconception that
the Spartans offered named burials to men who died in battle,
and women who died in childbirth -- illustrating that this interpretation
is based on a faulty emendation of the Greek text. However,
on the whole, given their specialist subject matter and depth,
they would perhaps not automatically appeal to a broader audience.
Having said that, each one is written (and/or translated) in
a manner which certainly makes them as accessible as possible
to a wider readership, meaning that they might conceivably be
approached by newcomers to those issues.
This book would certainly belong on the shelf of a serious
student of Sparta and Spartan culture. Beyond that, it would
no doubt be something which most people would dip into rather
than read in its entirety. Whilst several of the essays are
inherently enthralling and of wide-reaching appeal, most of
them are rather specialised and thus targeted at a narrow readership.
This is of course to be expected with this kind of collection.
|